Make your own GigaPans with the low-cost GigaPan Epic

You need the Adobe Flash player (version 8 or later) installed, and JavaScript enabled, to use the GigaPan viewer.


Snapshots

Subscribe to Feed

 
 
about this panorama
explore score
185
South Bank over looking the River Thames, Big Ben, London Eye

By:Gordon Atwell (SuperZoom) on February 22, 2008
Tags: bank , landmarks , london , eye , south , taxi , city , clock , boats , best , beta , river , attractions , ben , bridge , big , tower , night , cab , uk , thames

London at Night, taken from the South Bank Centre. Big Ben and the London Eye can be seen on the left, whilst the Royal Air Force Memorial, crowned by Sir William Reid Dick’s gilt eagle, can be seen in the centre of the GigaPan. There are numerous other hidden details to be discovered here.

Other GigaPans:
Olympic Football Stadium http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=8036

Bunny hunt http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=3768

The Pub http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=3328

The clock http://gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=4280

Date Taken: February 22, 2008
Date Added: February 22, 2008
Bookmarked: 8 times
Total Views: 342062 views
Gear: Canon S5, Manfrotto Tripod
Snapshots: 66
Size: 0.91 gigapixels
Field of View: 48.0 degrees wide, 28.9 degrees high


comments
May 17, 2008 07:02 Flag as inappropriate

very nice

Posted by MarcoLinori
May 18, 2008 18:23 Flag as inappropriate

The Eagle is the Royal Air Force memorial put up in 1923, no connection to the USA.

Posted by derek
May 20, 2008 09:09 Flag as inappropriate

good, very good. how many size, in megabytes, for this image?

Posted by blaze
May 20, 2008 12:08 Flag as inappropriate

Hi, Thanks for the comments. The original size for this image came out at nearly 3.5 gigabytes, I had to reduce this a little bit. The final image is composed of apx 673 individual images and took 55 minutes to shoot.

Posted by SuperZoom
May 25, 2008 23:53 Flag as inappropriate

Perfect

Posted by payam195r
May 26, 2008 06:01 Flag as inappropriate

Hi, I've only just come across the Gigapan 'world' through a small mention in Technology Review. Apologies of this is not the correct place to ask this question. I notice on some of the panoramas that the images do not join correctly, expecially on hard architectural detail. On this particular panorama you can see it clearly in the building with a light on it in the middle foreground on the left hand side just below the Millenium Wheel. Also on the clock face of Big Ben. Is this created by the system or an effect of the photography? I know with multi-image HDR photography it's best to use a fixed aperture when shooting the images, othewise the depth-of-field can change from image to image, making focused registration impossible. Is this a similar problem?

Posted by Patrick Collins
May 26, 2008 10:27 Flag as inappropriate

The artefacts that you have noticed are software glitches, as the stitching software that we are using is still in beta as indeed is the whole GigaPan project and is still being tested and refined by the scientists involved. You have noticed correctly that there are still some issues in regards to architectural images and shift rendering algorithms to some extent. Fixed aperture and focus were maintained throughout. Thanks for your enquiry.

Posted by SuperZoom
July 7, 2008 03:43 Flag as inappropriate

jjjj

Posted by 220posse
August 19, 2008 20:19 Flag as inappropriate

220posse what does jjjj ? signify

Posted by SuperZoom
November 7, 2008 22:02 Flag as inappropriate

Ear, superzoom, the snapshot tagged Homeless, i kept zooming in then out (as you do) and i cant get the image of a baby with a dummy in its mouth wearing a wooly hat like a pixies hat out of my mind. Do you see it? Or is it time for my medication!! Know wot i mean son? Enjoyed the pictures anyway, seeing as i am a "geezer" who was born in London. Now, i had better get back to me bunnies cos if i leave it too long i,ll have to find 3 times as many!! If you see what i mean john?

Posted by jwgacy
November 7, 2008 22:49 Flag as inappropriate

Yeah jwgacy, it is a very powerful image within an image, I do get told this regularly. I don't rightly know if it's a baby, a dog or a soft toy but yes it' looks well strange.

Posted by SuperZoom
April 19, 2009 07:30 Flag as inappropriate

looks better than a 3.5 gigabytes

Posted by extension
April 20, 2009 07:06 Flag as inappropriate

Hi extension, which 3.5 gigabyte image are you referring to?

Posted by SuperZoom
June 30, 2009 06:30 Flag as inappropriate

Fantastic!! I love this shot. Out of interest, how long were each of the exposures?

Posted by aliceralph